A Freezone Bible Supporter

Here is a complete Level 0 Academy pack from the 1970s
being posted in 11 parts.  Contents below following the
FZ Bible mission statement.

Much Love,

Tech Lover


**************************************************

FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


******** LEVEL ZERO ACADEMY COURSE PACK ********

Level 0 Academy Course Packs (2) circa 1974 and 1976,
Almost identical [Ed Note: differences noted like this]

Dark blue soft cardboard cover 
8 1/2 by 14 inch 4 hole punched & held together by 
double retainer clips. As issued by Pubs US.

This is complete including book excerpts but does not include
the complete book "Self Analysis" which is also part of the
level (it was posted to the internet last year).

This does not include transcripts of the level 0 tapes, but
we are working on those and will post them eventually.

Note that in the 1970s, HCOBs not written by Ron were converted
to BTBs (Board Technical Bulletins), resulting in the freequent
"reissued as BTB" designation.

Note that bulletins have a "distribution" near the top stating
where they are to be used.  A common distribution is "remimeo"
which means that the orgs may run copies on their mimeo machines.
Another, older, designation is "CenOcon" which means "Central
Orgs Continental".  Others such as "D of T" (director of training)
refer to posts in the Scientology organization.


********

CONTENTS:

part 1

01. BPL   26 JAN 72R  SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET
02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working
03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades
04. HCOB  11 JUN 64 New Student Data
05. HCOB  25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study
06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors
07. BPL   17 MAY 71RA r.13 NOV 72 r.10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions
08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing

part 2

09. HCOPL 15 DEC 65 Student's Guide To Acceptable Behavior
10. HCOPL 14 FEB 65 Safeguarding Technology
11. HCOB  27 SEP 66 The Anti-Social Personality
12. HCOPL 22 NOV 67 Rev. 18 JUL 70 Out Tech
13. HCOPL  8 JUN 70 Student Auditing
14. BPL   25 JUN 70RA Expanded Lower Grades
15. HCOB  25 SEP 71RA rev 4 APR 74 Tone Scale In Full
16. BTB   20 JUL 74 Basic Auditing Drills
17. HCOPL 14 OCT 68R rev 1 JAN 76 The Auditor's Code

part 3

18. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 25 JUL 74 Admin 14R The Worksheets
19. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 27 AUG 74 Admin 13R The Auditor Report Form
20. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 28 JUL 74 Admin 12R The Summary Report Form
21. BTB   20 JUN 70 reiss 21 JUL 74 Summary Report
22. BTB    6 NOV 72RA rev 20 NOV 74 Admin 11RA The Exam Report
23. HCOPL  8 MAR 71 Examiner's Form
24. BTB    5 NOV 72R rev 9 SEP 74 Admin 7R The Folder Summary
25. BTB   24 APR 69R rev 8 SEP 74 Preclear Assessment Sheet
26. HCOPL 23 APR 68 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms
27. HCOB  16 AUG 71 Training Drills Modernized

part 4

28. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA
29. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 
30. HCOB  15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2
31. HCOB  18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3
32. HCOB  29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist
33. HCOB  23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA
34. HCOB  21 OCT 68 Floating Needle
35. HCOB  11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC
36. HCOB  21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle
37. HCOB  20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena
38. HCOB   8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N
39. HCOB  21 MAR 74 End Phenomena
40. HCOB  14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything
41. HCOB  14 OCT 68 Meter Position
42. BTB   14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams"
43. HCOB  18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors
44. BTB   16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills
45. HCOB  11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check
46. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering
47. HCOB  10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching

part 5

48. HCOB   7 APR 64 Q And A
49. HCOB   3 AUG 65 Auditing Goofs Blowdown Interruption
50. HCOB   5 FEB 66 Letting The PC Itsa
51. HCOB   7 MAY 69 The Five GAEs
52. HCOB  17 MAY 69 TRs and Dirty Needles
53. BTB    4 JUL 69 r. 6 JUL 74 Auditing of OT 3 Preclears
54. BTB   17 JUL 69 r. 28 JUN 74 Flagrant Auditing Errors
55. HCOB  29 JUL 64 Good Indicators At Lower Levels
56. BTB   26 APR 69 r. 7 JUL 64 Bad Indicators
57. HCOPL  4 APR 72 rev. 7 APR 72 Ethics And Study Tech
58. HCOB  14 NOV 65 Clearing Commands
59. BTB    2 MAY 72R r. 10 JUN 74 Clearing Commands
60. BTB   18 NOV 68R r. 9 JUN 74 Model Session
61. HCOB  12 AUG 69 Flying Ruds
62. HCOB  23 AUG 71 (24 May 70 rev) Auditors Rights
63. HCOB   6 NOV 64 Styles of Auditing

part 6

64. HCOB  30 APR 71 Auditing Comm Cycle
65. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 2R The Two Parts Of Auditing
66. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 3 Three Important Comm Lines
67. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 4R Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle
68. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 5R The Comm Cycles In Auditing

part 7

69. HCOB  12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement
70. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand
71. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements
72. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives
73. HCOB  29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes
74. HCOB  17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions
75. BOOK  Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes

part 8

76. HCOB  16 FEB 59 Staff Auditor's Conference

part 9

77. HCOB  20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process
78. HCOB  16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running
79. HCOB   8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes
80. HCOB   9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two
81. HCOB  20 APR 60 Processes
82. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire
83. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills
84. BTB   15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads
85. BOOK  Creation of Human Ability R2-31
86. PAB    8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing

part 10

87. PAB   18 JUN 55 PAB 54 Reality Level of Preclear
88. HCOB  17 MAR 60 Standardized Sessions
89. HCOB   4 MAY 59 An Affinity Process
90. HCOB   2 MAR 61 New Pre-Hav Command
91. HCOB  25 SEP 59 HAS Co-Audit
92. HCOB  21 JUL 59 HGC Allowed Processes
93. BOOK   Creation of Human Ability R2-60
94. HCOB  13 OCT 59 D.E.I. Expanded Scale
95. HCOB   7 MAY 59 New Process Theory
96. BOOK   Scn 8-8008 6 Levels of Processing Issue 5
97. HCOB  11 DEC 64 Scientology 0 Processes
98. HCOB  26 DEC 64 Routine 0-A Expanded

part 11

99. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 29 JUL 74 Level 0 Drills
100. BTB  15 NOV 76 Grade Zero Processes - Quads

******** 

77. HCOB  20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER AD9

HCO Secs

Franchise Holders

D of P Central Orgs

AN EXPERIMENTAL PROCESS

Recall Processes have always worked well. But it has been
hard to get the most fundamental processes that would reach
the lowest cases.

Here are some Recall Processes that work way down South of
the Auks:

COMM RECALL PROCESS:

"Recall a Communication"


KNOW MYSTERY RECALL PROCESSES:

"Recall an Unconsciousness"

"Recall Waiting"

"Recall a Mystery"

"Recall Sex"

"Recall Eating" (or a variation

"Recall Food")

"Recall a Symbol"

"Recall Thinking"

"Recall an Effort"

"Recall an Emotion"

"Recall Looking"

"Recall Knowing"

"Recall Not-Knowing"


These are very good, especially on bad off cases. They all work.

When the lowest seems flat one can go to one above.
Probably there is an E-Meter tellingness that denotes
flatness. I'm working on this and will have the gen soon.

The earliest experiments of this were on "Recall a Mystery"
as a method of raising IQ and the pc was spouting poetry
he'd "forgotten".

There are many possible versions of these simplicities as
one can run them on terminals and significances. Also,
remember that these things (Recall Processes) take the pc
out of PT and put him back in. You stop one with the PC
back in PT. The Comm bridge to be used on this process is:
"When you next get an answer close to present time we will
end this process if it is all right with you." Then don't
go on for an hour or two, catch it with 8 or 10 commands by
seeing the pc is doing a short cycle at the time and has
started back up.

"Recall Exhaustion" is a simple, very effective version of
a work process.

"Recall Creating" is a good way, apparently, to mop up Step
6 flubs.

Therefore you can use these processes in the HGC or you
can, when it is okayed, use them in training. These are
individual processes and not co-audit. As a note on
co-audit, the process, the only basic affinity process,
"What would you like to confront," could cut your co-audit
attendance losses. It is now allowed, having been carefully
tested. Man, do they get interested in cases and hence into 
session. This is a fine individual process for pcs that 
"have no reality on pictures".


L. RON HUBBARD

LRH :js.rd
Copyright c 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


******** 

78. HCOB  16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
WASHINGTON, D.C.

HCO BULLETIN OF 16 FEBRUARY 1959

HGC PROCESSES FOR THOSE TRAINED IN ENGRAM RUNNING
OR TRAINED IN THESE PROCESSES


STARTING A CASE: BEGIN EVERY SESSION AS FOLLOWS WITH THESE
RUDIMENTS.

USE RUDIMENTS. FIND THE AUDITOR, FIND THE PC, FIND
THE AUDITING ROOM.

ESTABLISH A GOAL FOR THE SESSION. ASK FOR PRESENT
TIME PROBLEM.


PRESENT TIME PROBLEM:

If PTP exists then run it as follows and in no other way.
Do not yak around about it. Just ask if there is one, see
if one registers on the meter. On the PT PROBLEM THAT
REGISTERS ON THE METER (not some other one) do the following.

Ask for and write down all the persons connected with this
problem. That problem includes the preclear. On each of
these persons, one after the other, beginning with the one
most real to the pc, run this:

"Think of something you have done to (selected person)."
"Think of something you have withheld from (selected person)."

These commands are run one after the other until the
selected person chosen is somewhat flat. (Pc begins to
repeat things he has recalled before.)

Do this to each person involved in the problem.

PT PROBLEMS WERE CUT OUT OF HGC BECAUSE AUDITORS BURNED UP
HALF AN INTENSIVE ON THEM. A PT PROBLEM NEVER REQUIRES MORE THAN A
COUPLE OF HOURS TO FLATTEN. NO "WHEN" IS USED WITH PT PROBLEM BY
SELECTED PERSONS.

USE RUDIMENTS AND CHECK PT PROBLEM EACH SESSION AND HANDLE
AS ABOVE.


DYNAMIC STRAIGHT WIRE:

Do a survey, one time on the pc, not every session, to
discover any errors in their dynamics. This is done with an
E-Meter. On pcs not familiar with Sci. terms use the
following words: Self, sex, family, children, groups,
mankind, the animal kingdom, birds, beasts, fish,
vegetables, trees, growing things, matter, energy, space,
time, spirits, souls, gods, God.

Assess with this question only, "Tell me something that
would represent (each of the above, one after the other)."
When one changes the pattern of the needle action or when
it is definitely balmy, write it down. When list is
completed, take those items written down and run: "Think of
something you have done to (selected terminal you wrote
down)." "Think of something you have withheld from
(selected terminal, same one)." Run these questions on
each, one after the other, until pc seems flat.

IF NO DAFFY TERMINALS ARE FOUND ON SURVEY, SURVEY IT ALL AGAIN.
IF NONE ARE FOUND THIS SECOND TIME, SKIP THIS PROCESS.
DO THIS ONLY ONCE PER AUDITOR PER PC.


PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE:

This process goes rapidly into engrams but can be continued
even if engrams are contacted.

Run these two questions one after the other, one time per each.

"What part of your life would you be willing to re-experience?"

"What part of the future would you be willing to experience?"

KEEP AN ACCURATE RECORD OF ANY ENGRAMS CONTACTED. WHEN
ENGRAMS PERSIST IN THE PC'S VIEW, CAREFULLY SPOT THEM IN TIME 
FOR HIM.


ENGRAM RUNNING:

Find the engram necessary to resolve the case. ONCE YOU
HAVE CHOSEN IT AND HAVE BEGUN TO RUN IT, BE SURE YOU HAVE
THE MOTIVATOR AND THE OVERT AND THEN DO NOT DO NOT DO NOT 
DO NOT DEPART FROM THAT INCIDENT TO RUN ANOTHER THAT 
"DROPS BETTER" OR COMES UP. IN OTHER WORDS ONCE
YOU HAVE FOUND AN INCIDENT STAY ON IT UNTIL IT IS FLAT.


NOT-IS STRAIGHT WIRE:

When you have flattened an engram thoroughly with all five
commands gone over twice, run Not-Is Straight Wire between
incidents. In other words, flatten an engram, then run
Not-Is Straight Wire, get that a bit flat and locate and
run the next incident.

Selected Person Overt Withhold, and General Overt and
Withhold can be run on a pc only if they are biting. This
is also true of Not-Is Straight Wire.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:-.rd
Copyright c 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

********

79. HCOB   8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

HCO BULLETIN OF 8 APRIL AD 8

Issue II

A PAIR OF PROCESSES

Now and then I overhaul some old process once in use and
see what can be done to make it work.

Op Pro by Dup and Forgetting are a pair that recently
showed up as having a possible specific valuei.e. to
create a specific effect upon a specific difficulty.

Evidently Admiration and Critical are a dichotomy. Maxine
Kozak suggests that Duplication is Admiration. From this I
looked over Critical on the APA (OCA) profile and saw that
the low critical might be influenced by Op Pro by Dup. A
test should be made of this.

The other process is less nebulous in action. The specific
for a bad memory is Forgetting run in Brackets. You will
ordinarily find an automaticity of forgetting when you ask
"Recall something you wouldn't mind other people
forgetting." This is a "bad memory". Nothing like a good
conscience to retain a good memory.

The commands of Forgetting would be a 6-way bracket.

Recall (or think of) something you wouldn't mind

1. Forgetting yourself

2. Another person forgetting

3. Forgetting about another

4. Another forgetting about you

5. Other people forgetting

6. Another person forgetting about another person.

Each command is cleared. The commands are run in sequence
rather than repetition.

This is a low scale process. Goes lower than "Not know" but
graduates into it.

This is a basic on unknowns and fields of whatever kind.

L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:bt.cden
Copyright c 1958
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

[Ed Note: This bulletin was also reproduced verbatim in
PAB 143]


******** 

80. HCOB   9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 9 MARCH 1960

Fran Hldrs
Central Orgs


EXPANSION OF OT-3A PROCEDURE, STEP TWO

HGC ALLOWED PROCESSES

Step Two of OT-3A Procedure is as follows:

Run Cause ARC Straight Wire to give pc a win on getting
audited. Once each over and over. End process only with pc
in present time on cycle.

"Recall communicating to someone"

"Recall a time you felt affinity for someone"

"Recall something that is really real to you"

Now people do have time tracks, the time span of the
individual from beingness to present time on which lies the
sequence of events of his total existence. And when the
preclear is in session and is being run on a recall type
process, he, with his attention, goes up and down this time
track. He may recall things only from this life or he may
recall things from his whole past track; but however that
may be, his attention cycles from early on the track to
present time or from present time to early on the track to
present time. This is known as the cycle aspect of recall
type processes. In ending such a process, it is of utmost
importance that the auditor end it with the preclear in
present time on the cycle. The auditor wants to watch
ending the process when the preclear has not made a smooth
cycle into present time, but has made a big jump from way
back in the past to present time. In such a case, the
preclear has really bounced out of the past incident into
present time, and it is only an apparency that the preclear
is in present time.

So when ending such a process, the auditor must exert
caution to be certain the preclear is in present time.
Being left with one's attention back on the track is not a
comfortable sensation and sometimes can be quite painful,
despite any justification offered by an auditor who himself
has no reality on the time track, and I hope there are no
such auditors.

With Cause ARC Straight Wire, the auditor must forget his
fastidiousness about ending the process precisely so on the
last command, "Recall something that is really real to
you." He ends the process, no matter on what command of
Cause ARC Straight Wire, when the preclear's attention has
come into or close to present time, close to present time
being the last day or two.

In ending such a process the communication bridge used is
as follows: "The next time you come close to present time I
am going to end this process." He continues to give the
commands using the question, "When was that?", after each
answer the preclear gives and before the acknowledgement.
When the preclear gives an answer close to present time, he
says, "That was the last command of that process; end of
process." Bang. With processes that cycle, there can be no
communication bridges like, "If it's alright with you in a
few more commands I am going to end this process." It could
take fifty more commands until the preclear is close to
present time; and by that time, the preclear has entirely
forgotten that there ever was any intention on the
auditor's part to end the process as it seems to him that
the auditor must have changed his mind and decided to run
the process longer than a few commands.

An auditor should not get upset with a preclear when the
auditor, in an effort to get the preclear to give an answer
right in present time, starts the preclear back down the
time track again. Remember it is the auditor who calls the shot, 
and if he misses, then he had better learn to gage it a bit
better. A good auditor allows himself time in which to
properly end a process.

Now two further cyclic processes which can be seen under
Step Two of OT-3A are: 1. "What would it be all right for
you to make forgotten?"

2. "What would you permit to have happen again?"

These are called Cause Elementary Straight Wire and are two
separate processes which are not to be run alternately.

The first process puts the preclear at cause over
forgetting, and the second process rehabilitates the
preclear's ability to duplicate. These are both terrific
processes in turning on recall in the preclear. All
processes under Step Two are unlimited, with the "make
forgotten" one only slightly less unlimited as it has a bit
of a tendency to run down havingness.

Havingness, however, should be checked upon in each session
and run as needed.

The auditor should not consider Step Two of OT-3A lightly.
These processes are, in reality, very potent and will
certainly do more for CCH-step cases than anything we have
had before. An example of this is how preclears broke
through from psychosis to neurosis to sanity with the
simplified version of ARC Straight Wire as given in the
original Self Analysis. So use these processes and win faster.

Note: On second thoughts for purposes of differentiation,
the first process, "What would it be all right for you to
make forgotten?", should be termed Cause Elementary
Straight Wire; and the second process, "What would you
permit to have happen again?", shall be called Duplication
Straight Wire. These two processes were first used in early
Advanced Clinical Courses in Phoenix and were called at
that time "Elementary Straightwire". The commands of
"Elementary Straightwire" as given in Dianetics 1955 were:
"Give me something you wouldn't mind remembering" and "Give
me something you wouldn't mind forgetting". As the ability
to recall depends upon the mechanisms of forgetting and
remembering (the ability to duplicate) you can easily
understand the importance of these in Step Two of OT-3A.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:js.rd
Copyright  1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


********

81. HCOB  20 APR 60 Processes

[Ed. Note: This was an HCOB and is on the checksheet but it was
not by Ron and therefore is not in the Tech volumes.  It is
present in the 1974 pack but missing from the 1976 one.]

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF APRIL 20, 1960

CenO.
Franchise Holders

PROCESSES

Dick Halpern, in charge of the First South African ACC in
Johannesburg, has sent a dispatch to Ron in which he states
that Cause Elementary Straight Wire is most suitable for
raising low tone arms, while Duplication Straight Wire is
most suitable for lowering high tone arm.  Dick has tested
this on ACC students, and found the results excellent.

The command of Cause Elementary Straight Wire is "What
would it be all right for you to make forgotten?"

The command of Duplication Straight Wire is: "What would
you permit to have happen again?"

Issued by:- PETER HEMERY
HCO Secretary WW

for L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:js:mb
Copyright c. 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


********

82. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1968
Issue II

Remimeo
All Dianetic
Courses


ARC STRAIGHT WIRE

(Corrects HCO B 30 June 1962 and also
in the HDA Course book. Corrects p. 102
[soft-cover edition] of Self Analysis.)
(Paste over HDA Course page 15.)
(Corrects earlier HCO B of same date & title.)


The correct commands for ARC Straight Wire, as researched
and as successful in test in cracking even neurotic cases,
with one command added to modernize it, were and are:

Recall a time that was really real to you.

Recall a time you were in good communication with someone.

Recall a time you really felt affinity for someone.

Recall a time you knew you understood something.

Run ONLY on a Meter.

Run ONLY to Floating Needle and NOT beyond. (Don't abruptly
cut pc's Comm.) 

A true fact is that ARC always must precede
an ARC Break.

Also ARC = Understanding and Time.

A = Space and the willingness to occupy the same space of.

R = Mass or agreement.

C = Energy or Recognition.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.ei.rd
Copyright c 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


******** 

83. BTB   9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills


B O A R D T E C H N I C A L B U L L E T I N

9 OCTOBER 1971 RA
REVISED 8 AUGUST 1973
REVISED & REISSUED 28 JUNE 1974 AS BTB
( REVISION IN ITALICS )

Remimeo 
Level 0 
Chksht
Level VI 
Chksht 

CANCELS
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 OCTOBER 1971 R
SAME TITLE


Auditor Drills Series No. 1RA


ARC STRAIGHTWIRE DRILLS


WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON CORRECT APPLICATION OF SELF
ANALYSIS PROCESSING.

PURPOSE: To improve the quality of auditing by
familiarizing Auditors with the exact procedure of each
auditing action through the use of drills.

HOW TO USE: These drills are in order by levels . The first
number indicates the level taught on. Those that begin with
TR 00 - ( drill No . ) are Level Zero Drills . The double
zero is to differentiate the drills from TR 0-4.
Unbullbaited drills end in odd numbers; and bullbaited end
in even numbers.

Most drills are done within the basic formats as laid out.
Any that don't will be fully covered in the specific drills
themselves.

Simply start with the first actions and work through the
drills in the order given as it's the same order as the ARC
ST. Wire Expanded Grade BTB 4 Jan 72 RA. Each drill is done
until you know you can do it flawlessly, even while being
bullbaited.

If a student has trouble on a drill, locate whether the
student has a misunderstood or has a skipped gradient and
handle either or both with standard Study Tech. This can
lead back to outnesses on basics such as TRs, codes or
scales. Whatever it is, find out why and handle.

NOTE: If coach upset occurs because of restimulation, fruit
words should be inserted in the place of the process Key
Words, for bullbaited drills only.


FORMAT FOR UNBULLBAITED DRILLS

NAME: Auditing on a doll unbullbaited.

COMMANDS: As for each separate process.

PURPOSE: To train the student to be able to coordinate and
apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing
action with the actual doingness of auditing.

POSITION: Student seated at a table with E-Meter,
worksheets and auditing forms as needed.

In the chair opposite the student is a doll occupying the
position of the PC. (During drill the coach is seated or
standing beside the Auditor. He does not take the position
of the doll.) TRAINING STRESS: This drill is coached. The
student sets up the E-Meter and worksheets exactly as in a
session - as follows:

1. Set up E-Meter as for E-Meter drills.

2. Set up shield to prevent TA and admin being seen by PC (doll).

3. Have extra pens under the E-Meter.

4. Have C/S face down between the bottom of the E-Meter and
the table.

5. Have W/S and Lists readily available in sequence
required for the session.

Auditor starts the session and runs a standard session with
the particular auditing action being taken up on the doll,
keeping full session admin and using all standard
procedures of the auditing action. Coach watches drill and
points out any outnesses noted giving a"that's it"and a
re-start. Outnesses should be handled one at a time until
none exist..

The drill is done on a steeper and steeper gradient until
the student can very quickly do the action correctly.

The drill is passed when the student can do the drill
flawlessly with good TRs 0-4, correct procedure and
commands, without comm lags or confusion; ie. flawlessly!


FORMAT TO BE USED FOR BULLBAITED DRILLS

NAME: Auditing _____________ Bullbaited.

COMMANDS: As for each separate auditing action.

PURPOSE: To train the student to be able to coordinate and
apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing
action in a drill similar to a real auditing session and
thereby become flawless in applying it.

POSITION: Student seated at a table with E-Meter and
Auditor forms, as needed. In the chair opposite the Auditor
is a doll as PC. Coach sits beside doll and is the
bullbaiter and gives answers as PC, not about his own case.

TRAINING STRESS: The drill is the same as for auditing on a
doll except that the "PC"coach bullbaits the student
Auditor using "fruit"answers during the session in an
attempt to throw the student off session. On any list, the
coach squeezes the cans to simulate reads. He still uses
"fruit"answers (six apples, blue pears) when asked to
speak, but as the student Auditor reads off the list items
(eg. L3RF) he squeezes the cans for reads.

When bullbaiting an auditing action the coach should THROW
IN VARIOUS SIGNS OF PC OUT OF SESSIONNESS. (Per HCOB on
Good Indicators and BTB on Bad Indicators.) The student 
Auditor must:

1. Obnose the out of sessionness.

2. Align this to the process run.

3. Handle.

An example is, on a Listing and Nulling procedure an out of
sessionness is observed, the Auditor queries and follows
through with an L4BRA at once. (An L4BRA is a repair list.)
The PC bullbaiter can throw in situations, originate
troubles or gains, be tricky, etc. But he must never lose
sight of HCOB 24 May 1968 "Coaching", especially the second
paragraph -" Coach with reality".

Once the coach throws out a situation, etc. he must allow
the student Auditor to carry it out, and handle the
situation before the coach calls a new situation.

Stress is on training the student Auditor to have his TRs 0
- 4 in on the bullbaiter.

The coach (bullbaiter) does the "start", flunking or
"That's it". Flunks are given for any improper commands,
procedure, comm lags, break in TRs or improper session admin.

Each drill is to be done thoroughly, building up the speed
of Auditor commands and actions. ("It's the number of
auditing commands per unit of auditing time which makes
gains in a session." LRH)

When the student Auditor has done these steps to his
satisfaction, he gets a starrate checkout. The drill is
passed when the student can do the drill flawlessly with
excellent TRs 0 -4, correct procedure and commands, without
comm lags or confusion. These are the drills that train the
student Auditor to handle all the elements in a session, so
be exact and be real.

NOTE: Clearing of commands is per BTB 2 May 72R and other
Bulletins and PLs on the subject (ie. clearing each word of
command backwards).


TR 00-1 "REMEMBER SOMETHING" UNBULLBAITED.

TR 00-2 "REMEMBER SOMETHING" BULLBAITED.

Ref. Dianetics 55

STEPS:

1. R- factor to PC that you are going to run ARC
Straightwire Expanded processes. Clear "ARC", "What 
does ARC mean to you?" Then clear the words 
"Straightwire and expanded" in the same way. Use a 
Scientology and regular dictionary do clear up
any the PC doesn't know or has confusion on. Make sure the
PC understands what is going to happen and is happy to be
run on the processes, and that a good Auditor - PC- Auditor
Comm Cycle is in.

2. Tell the PC "The first process of ARC SW Expanded is a
repetitive process." Clear the word "repetitive"so that the
PC understands how the process is to be run. Tell the PC
that when he has carried out the auditing command he should
tell you what he recalled or thought of, not just an answer
like "yes"to the command (ref. HCOB 30 June 62). This
applies to all processes of this level and PC must
understand this.

3. Clear the command with the PC - "What is the definition
of the word ___________ ?" Clear the word "something"first
- then the word "remember".

4. Run the process repetitively, same command over and
over, to F/N Cog VGIs.


TR 00-3 "RECALL A TIME" UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-4 "RECALL A TIME" BULLBAITED

Ref: Staff Auditors Conference of 18 Feb 59

STEPS:

l. R-factor - "We are going to run an ARC SW process. This
is a repetitive process." 2. Clear the command - "What is
the definition of the word __________ ?" clear "Time, A,
Recall" in that order.

Be sure to use the Scientology Dictionary definition of"recall".

3. Run the process repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



TR 00-5 COMM RECALL PROCESS UNBULLBAITED.

TR 00-6 COMM RECALL PROCESS BULLBAITED.

Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process

STEPS:

1. R- factor - "We are going to run a process called Comm
Recall Process. "Make sure PC understands that "Comm" is
short for "Communication". Tell PC - "This is a repetitive
process."

2. Clear the command word by word backwards as in the above drills.

3 . Run the process command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs .


TR 00-7 THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-8 THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS BULLBAITED

Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process

STEPS:

1. R-factor - "We are going to run a process called The
Only Basic Affinity Process." 2. Tell PC "This process has
three commands, each is run separately in a repetitive manner."

3. Clear the first command as in the earlier drills.

4. Run the first process command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.

5. R-factor - "Now we'll run the second command."

6. Clear the second command as in the earlier drills.

7. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.

8. R-factor - "Now we'll run the third command."

9. Clear the third command as in the earlier drills.

10. Run the third command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.


TR 00-9  EXHAUSTION     UNBULLBAITED
TR 00-10 EXHAUSTION     BULLBAITED

Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process

STEPS:

1. R-factor - "We are going to run a process called
'Exhaustion'.  This is a repetitive process with one
command.

2. Clear the command as in the earlier drills.

3. Run the process command repetititvely to F/N Cog VGIs.


TR 00-11 PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-12 PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE BULLBAITED

Ref: HCOB 16 Feb 59 HGC Processes for those trained in
engram running or trained in these processes.

STEPS:

1. R- factor - "We are going to run a process called "Past
and Future Experience".

This process has two commands which are run alternately,
one after the other, over and over.

2. Clear the first command as in earlier drills. Then clear
the second command.

3. Run the process commands alternately (1-2-1-2, etc. )
over and over until the PC has F/N Cog VGIs.


TR 00-13 FORGETTING - 6 WAY BRACKET UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-14 FORGETTING - 6 WAY BRACKET BULLBAITED

Ref: HCOB 8 April 58 A Pair of Processes

PAB 143

STEPS:

1 . R-factor - "We are going to run a process called
'Forgetting'. It has six commands, each of which is run by
itself repetitively."

2. Clear the first command as in earlier drills. PC must
understand that he is to recall when he himself forgot
something.

3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs .

4. R-factor. "Now we'll run the second command."

5. Clear the second command.

6. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.

7. Repeat steps 4 - 7 on each command 3 through 6 in turn 
(R - factor each time refers to "third command", "fourth
command", etc.)


TR 00-15 CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-16 CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE BULLBAITED

Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, step two
HGC allowed processes.

HCOB 20 April 60 Processes.

STEPS:

1. R - factor - "We are going to run a process called
'Cause Elementary Straightwire'. Clear the words "Cause" 
and "Elementary". This process has three commands; each is 
run by itself repetitively. 

2 . Clear the first command.

3. Run the first command of the process repetitively to F/N
Cog VGIs.

4. R-factor "Now we are going to run the second command."

5. Clear the second command.

6. Run the second command of the process repetitively to
F/N Cog VGIs.

7. R - factor - "Now we are going to run the third command."

8. Clear the third command.

9. Run the third command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.


TR 00-17 DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-18 DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE BULLBAITED

Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, step two
HGC Allowed

Processes.

STEPS:

1. R-factor - "We are going to run a process called
Duplication Straightwire'." Clear the word "Duplication"
with the PC.

"This process has three commands , each run by itself
repetitively."

2. Clear the first command.

3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.

4. R - factor "Now we are going to run the second command."

5. Clear the second command.

6. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.

7. R - Factor "Now we are going to run the third command."

8. Clear the third command.

9. Run the third command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.


TR 00-19 KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-20 KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS BULLBAITED

Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process

Scn 0-8 Expanded Know to Mystery Scale

STEPS:

1. R- factor "We are going to run the Know to Mystery
Recall Process'. This process is used with a scale called
the Know to Mystery Scale. It has a number of commands,
each of which is run by itself repetitively."

2. Clear the first command.

3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.

4. R- factor - "Now we are going to run the second command."

5. Clear the second command.

6. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.

7. Do steps 4 - 6 on each command in turn 3 through 13 ( R
- factor on each matches the number of the command"third
command","fourth command", etc. Also that command is the
one cleared and then run).


TR 00-21 SELF ANALYSIS LISTS UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-22 SELF ANALYSIS LISTS BULLBAITED

Ref: Book - Self Analysis
PAB 46

R-FACTOR TO AUDITOR: It is very important that the Auditor
have a fuIl understanding of the purpose and technique of
Self Analysis processing. This data is contained in the
book and must be thoroughly studied with particular
attention to the "Processing Section." 

THESE PROCESSES PREPARE THE PC'S CASE FOR AUDITING ON DIANETICS. 
In running these lists the Auditor directs the PC to moments
action took place, not when somebody said it took place or
merely the concept that it did happen. YOU GET THE ACTUAL
PHYSICAL OCCURRENCE. Each time you ask the PC to recall an
incident of a certain kind you then ask, after he recalls
it, to pay attention to a certain sense channel which was
present during the time he experienced it. The circular
disc is provided for the purpose of directing which sense
to pay particular attention to. You place the disc over the
question you are going to ask and the sense perception at
the top is asked for. When you go to the next list question
you move the disc over it and rotate it one sense
counter-clock- wise so that you have a new sense to ask for.

When you go to a new page of questions in the book you turn
over the disc so that you have a new set of senses to ask
for. If you don't have a disc use the same senses as listed
on the bottom of each page and tick them off one after the
other as you go along.

The Auditor should make sure that the PC speaks aloud the
things he is recalling. The preclear's nod or "yes" to
signify that he has recalled something is insufficient.
Have him select an actual moment in his life called for by
the question. Try to get him to re-sense that moment with
the perceptic called for on the disc.

If the PC finds it extremely difficult to recall any one
question in these lists, simply pass over it and go to the
next question. You can go over a list more than once if the
PC does not reach EP the first time through.

STEPS:

1. R- factor to PC - "We are now going to run the Self
Analysis lists from the book Self Analysis. I will be
asking you to recall specific incidents in your life. Try
to recall the moment it actually occurred, not just the
concept that it did occur. When you have recalled it tell
me what it is. Then I will ask you to pay particular
attention to a certain sense perception in the incident.
Try to re-sense that moment with the perceptic called for."

2. Clear the sense perceptics with the PC.

Clear "emotion"as that emotion the PC felt at the time of
the incident. Clear "loudness" as the loudness of the
various sounds in the incident.

Clear "body position" as the position of his own body at
the time the incident occurred.

Clear "sound" as those sounds in the incident.

Clear "weight" as the heaviness of the things , including
the pull of gravity on the PC and the weight of anything he
may actually be supporting in the incident such as his
clothes, a ball or and other thing which he is actually
holding at the time the incident occurred.

Clear "personal motion" as the motion which the PC himself
was undertaking at the time the incident occurred.

Clear "sight" as what the PC actually saw at the time the
incident was taking place.

Clear "smell" as what odors were present during the scene
he is recalling.

Clear "touch" as anything he was actually touching at the
time with the sensation of touch including pressure.

Clear "colour" as the actual colour contained in the scene
called for.

Clear "tone" as the quality of the sound present when the
scene occurred.

Clear "external motion" as the motion of other people or
objects or of energy.

3. Clear the commands for List 1, clearing each word of the
basic question backwards.

"What is the definition of the word ____________?"

Clear - "Can you recall a time when _____________ ?"

"Can you recall another time when ____________ ?"

"Can you recall the earliest time when ____________ ?"

4. R- factor to PC "We will clear the additional words to
each list question as we go along."

5. To PC - "This is the process."

6. Place the disk over the first question.

7. Clear the first question - "What is the definition of
the word _________ ?" Clear "happy" and "were". "You" has
already been cleared so needn't be again. In clearing the
list questions the words that are repeated need only be
cleared the first time they come up.

8. Ask PC - "Can you recall a time when you were happy?"

9. PC answers and Auditor acknowledges. If PC only nods or
says "yes"Auditor asks "What was it?", gets the answer and
acknowledges PC.

10. Auditor says "Try to see what you saw in the incident."
( Or whatever perceptic you start with. )

11. PC indicates he has , Auditor acks and then asks -
"What did you see' at that time?" 12. PC answers and
auditor acks.

13. Auditor asks PC - "Can you recall another time when you
were happy ?" 14. PC answers and auditor acks and then says
- "Try to see' what you saw in the incident."

15. PC indicates that he has, Auditor acks and then asks
"What did you see' at that time?" 

16. PC answers and Auditor acks.

17. Auditor asks PC - "Can you recall the earliest time
when you were happy?" 18. PC answers and Auditor acks and
then says - "Try to 'see' what you saw in the incident."

19. PC indicates he has, auditor acks and then asks "What
did you see' at that time?" 

20. PC answers and auditor acks.

21. Auditor moves the disc down to question 2 and rotates
the disc one perceptic counter - clockwise.

22. Clear the new words that are in question No.2 - "What
is the definition of _______?" (Clear - something, constructing, 
finished, just, had).

23. Auditor asks PC - "Can you recall a time when you had
just finished constructing something?"

24. PC answers by telling auditor what it is and auditor acks.

25. Auditor says to PC - "Recall the odors that you smelled
in the incident." 

26. PC indicates he has, Auditor acks and then asks - "What 
odors did you smell at that time?"

27. Auditor continues as above handling each list question-
by rotating the disc for each new question and asking for
an incident, another incident and the earliest incident
that he can recall. The questions to direct the PC to re -
sense the different perceptions are not all the same exact
patter as each must communicate as itself. The questions -
would be:

SIGHT: "Try to see' what you saw in the incident."

"What did you 'see' at that time?"

SMELL.: "Recall the odors that you smelled in the incident"

"What odors did you smell at that time?"

TOUCH: "Recall what you were touching in the incident."

"What were you touching at that time?;'

COLOR: "Try to perceive the colors in the incident."

"What colors did you perceive at that time?"

TONE: "Try to contact the tone of the sounds present in the
incident."

"What tones were present at that time?"

EXTERNAL "Try to perceive the external motion in the incident."

MOTION: "What external motion did you perceive at that time?"

EMOTION: "Try to recall and feel again the emotion you felt
in the incident." "What emotion did you feel at that time?"

LOUDNESS: "Pay particular attention to the loudness of the
sounds in the incident."

"What was the loudness of the sounds at that time?"

BODY "Pay particular attention to your own body position in the

POSITION: incident."

"What was your body position at that time?"

SOUND: "Pay particular attention to the sounds in the incident."

"What sounds were there at that time?"

WEIGHT: "Pay attention to the weight of things in the incident."

"What was the weight of things at that time?"

PERSONAL "Pay attention to your personal motion in the incident."

MOTION: "What personal motion was there at that time?"

Each list is run to F/N Cog VGIs. You would then go on to
the next list.

In List 2 each list question has sub-questions which are
also asked, such as - "Can you recall an incident which
happened a long time ago?" "What year was it?" "What was
the month?" "What was the date?" "What was the hour?" You
would then direct him to pay particular attention to one of
the senses and so on as in the earlier list.

All new words must be cleared as you go along, clearing the
words of the questions backwards.

When starting List 5 give the PC an R-factor:

"In answering these questions particular attention should
be paid to happier incidents.

(See preface to List 5)


TR 00-23 ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-24 ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES BULLBAITED

Ref: HCOB 27 Sept 68 ARC Straightwire

STEPS:

1. R- factor - "We are going to run an ARC SW Expanded
process called ARC SW Triples'. This process has three
sets of commands with 4 commands in each set. Each set will
be run separately with the commands in that set run
alternately, one after the other, over and over."

2. Clear the first set of commands starting with the first
command clearing each word going backwards through the
command .

3. Run the first set of commands alternately, over and over
1-2-3-4, 1-2-3-4, etc. ) to F/N Cog VGIs. End off the
series of commands for that flow when F/N Cog VGIs is reached.

4. R - factor "Now we are going to run the second set of commands."

5. Clear the commands of Flow 2 in the same way as in Step 2.

6. Run the second Flow in the same way as in Step 3 to F/N
Cog VGIs.

7. R-factor "Now we are going to run the third set of commands"

8. Clear the commands of Flow 3 as in Step 2.

9. Run Flow 3 as in Step 3.


TR 00-25 HAVINGNESS UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-26 HAVINGNESS BULLBAITED

Ref: HCOB 3 Dec 56 B. Scn - HAA Techniques
PAB 54


STEPS:

1. R- factor "We are going to run the Havingness process
for ARC SW." Clear the word "Havingness". "This process has
three commands; each is run by itself repetitively."

(NOTE: As with the other processes PC is to tell you what
he found when he did the command. )

2. Clear the first command.

3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.

4 . R- factor - "Now we are going to run the second command."

5. Clear the command of Flow 2.

6. Run Flow 2 repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.

7. R-factor - "Now we are going to run the third command."

8. Clear the command of Flow 3.

9 . Run Flow 3 repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs .

Mark Ingber
Flag Tech Compilations

Revised & Reissued as BTB
By Flag Mission 1234
I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis
2nd: Molly Harlow
Authorized by AVU
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY

BDCS:SW:AL:MH:MI:mh
Copyright c 1971, 1974 
by L. Ron Hubbard 
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 

[Ed Note: The later 1976 pack has the identical BTB with the
name Mark Ingber, which appears in the 1974 pack, removed from
the signature]

******** 

84. BTB   15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads

[Ed. Note: This is the QUAD version from the 1976 pack. 
The 1974 pack contained the TRIPLES version.

This Quad version adds a 4th flow (flow 0, you to yourself)
command to processes 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12 below but is 
otherwise identical to the previous Triples version.

The triples version was 4 JAN 72RA revised 14 JUL 73,
revised & reissued 28 JUN 74 as BTB cancelling HCOB
of 4 JAN 72R same title.]


B O A R D T E C H N I C A L B U L L E T I N

15 NOVEMBER 1976
ISSUE I

Remimeo


CANCELS BTB 4 JANUARY 1972RB
"0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES - TRIPLES
PART A ARC STRAIGHTWIRE"

( Revisisions in script. )

O-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES - QUADS

PART A

ARC STRAIGHTWIRE

This Bulletin gives a checklist of the Expanded Quad Grade
Process Commands. It is not all the possible processes for
this level. If more are needed to attain full EP for the
level, additional processes can be found in LRH Bulletins,
Books, Tapes, PABs and other issues.

Each process is run to its full End Phenomena of F/N, Cog,
VGIs. Any previously run are rehabbed or completed and and
missing flows run.

A copy of this checklist is placed in the folder of a pc
being run on Expanded Grades and the processes checked off
with the date each is run to EP.

On any of these processes where the pc answers only" yes"
or that he did it, find out what it was by asking" What was
it?" This keeps in the itsa line from pc to auditor.
(Reference HCOB 30 June 62.)

This Bulletin does not replace Source data.


1. REMEMBER SOMETHING

Ref: Dianetics 55 (page 129 in 1971 Edition)

"Remember something." Repetitive to EP. __________


2. RECALL A TIME

Ref: Staff Auditors Conference of 16 Feb 59

(refers to HCOB of 16 Feb 59 HGC
processes for those trained in engram
running or trained in these processes).

"Recall a time." Repetitive to EP. __________


3. COMM RECALL PROCESS

Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process.

"Recall a communication." Repetitive to EP. __________


4. THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS

Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process.

"What would you like to confront?"

Repetitive to EP. __________

"What would another like to confront?"

Repetitive to EP. __________

"What would others like to confront?"

Repetitive to EP. __________

"What would you like to confront in yourself?"

Repetitive to EP. __________


4A. EXHAUSTION

Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process.

"Recall exhaustion."

Repetitive to EP. __________


5. PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE

Ref: HCOB 16 Feb 59 HGC Processes for those
trained in engram running or trained in
these processes.

HCOB 16 Feb 59 Staff
Auditors Conference.

"What part of your life would you be willing to re-experience?"

"What part of the future would you be willing to experience?"

Run Alternately to EP. __________


6. FORGETTING - 6 WAY BRACKET

Ref: HCOB 8 Apr 58 A Pair of Processes.
PAB 143.

"Recall (or think of) something you wouldn't mind"

Run the bracket in sequence to EP.

1."Forgetting yourself." __________

2."Another person forgetting." __________

3."Forgetting about another." __________

4."Another forgetting about you." __________

5."Other people forgetting." __________

6."Another person forgetting about another person."
__________


7 . CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE

Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure,
step two HGC allowed processes.

HCOB 20 Apr 60 Processes.

"What would it be all right for another to make forgotten?"

Repetitive to EP. __________

"What would it be all right for you to make forgotten?"

Repetitive to EP . __________

"What would it be all right for others to make forgotten?"

Repetitive to EP . __________

"What would it be alright for you to make forgotten about
yourself ?"

Repetitive to EP. __________


8 . DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE

Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure,
step two HGC allowed processes

"What would another permit to have happen again ?"

Repetitive to EP. __________

"What would you permit to have happen again ?"

Repetitive to EP. __________

"What would others permit to have happen again ?"

Repetitive to EP. __________

"What would you permit to have happen to yourself again ?"

Repetitive to EP. __________


9. KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS

Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process

Scn 0-8 Expanded Know to Mystery Scale

"Recall an unconsciousness." to EP __________

"Recall waiting." to EP __________

"Recall a mystery." to EP __________

"Recall sex." to EP __________

"Recall eating" to EP __________

"Recall a symbol." to EP __________

"Recall thinking." to EP __________

"Recall an effort." to EP __________

"Recall an emotion." to EP __________

"Recall looking." to EP __________

"Recall knowing about." to EP __________

"Recall not knowing." to EP __________

"Recall knowing." to EP __________



10. SELF ANALYSIS LISTS

Ref: PAB 46
Book Self Analysis (Run per instructions in book.)


List One. to EP __________

List Two. to EP __________

List Three: Time Sense to EP __________

  Sight to EP __________

  Relative Sizes to EP __________

  Sound to EP __________

  Olfactory to EP __________

  Touch to EP __________

  Personal Emotion to EP __________

  Organic Sensation to EP __________

  Motion Personal to EP __________

  Motion External to EP __________

  Body Position to EP __________

List Four. to EP __________

List Five. to EP __________

List Six. to EP __________

List Seven. to EP __________

List Eight. to EP __________

List Nine. to EP __________

List Ten. to EP __________

List Eleven. to EP __________

List Twelve. to EP __________


11. ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES

Ref: HCOB 27 Sept 68 ARC Straight Wire

SW Fl. 

"Recall a time that was really to you."

"Recall a time someone was in good communication with you."

"Recall a time someone really felt affinity for you."

"Recall a time anothor knew he/she understood you."

to EP __________


SW. F2. 

"Recall a time that was really real to another."

"Recall a time you were in good communication with someone."

"Recall a time you really felt affinity for someone"

"Recall a time you knew you understood someone."

to EP __________


SW. F3. 

"Recall a time that was really real for others."

"Recall a time another was in communication with others."

"Recall a time another really felt affinity for others."

"Recall a time another knew he/she understood others."

to EP __________


SW. F0. 

"Recall a time you were really real to yourself."

"Recall a time you were in good communication with yourself."

"Recall a time you really felt affinity for yourself."

"Recall a time you knew you understood yourself."

to EP __________


12. HAVINGNESS

Ref: HCOB 3 Dec 56 B. Scn - HAA Techniques
PAB 54

SWH F1. "Look around here and find something
that is really real to you."

to EP __________

SWH F2. "Look around here and find something
that would be really real to another."

to EP __________


SWH F3. "Look around here and find something
that would be really real to others."

to EP __________

SWH F0. "Look around here and find something
that you could make really real to yourself."

to EP __________


Reissued as BTB
by Flag Mission 1234
I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis
2nd: Molly Harlow

Revised by FMO 1689 I/C
for Tr & Serv Aide
Approved by Snr C/S Flag, CS-5
Authorized by AVU
and LRH Pers Com

for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY

BDCS:KU:DM:JE:JG:PD:AL:MH:lf
Copyright c 1973, 1974, 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

[Ed Note: The previous TRIPLES version mentioned at the
begining had W/O (Warrant Officer) Mark Ingber as the
author followed by the begining of the signature above
up to but not including FMO 1689.]

******** 

85. BOOK Creation of Human Ability R2-31


R2-31: BEINGNESS PROCESSING

Exerpted from the Book: Creation of Human Ability

The cardinal rule where mental or physical compulsions are
concerned follows: WHATEVER THE THETAN IS DOING OBSESSIVELY
OR COMPULSIVELY, HAVE HIM DO IT ON A SELF-DETERMINED BASIS.

This applies to machines, habits, twitches, etc.

There is a gradient scale of exteriorization which could be
described as follows: first, the thetan without contact
With a universe then a thetan in full contact with a
universe then a thetan in contact with part of a universe,
who considers the remainder of the universe barred to him
then a thetan in a universe without any contact with any
part of the universe then a thetan unknowingly in contact
with a large part of a universe. The first condition would
be a true Static, the last condition is called colloquially
in Scientology, buttered all over the universe. As it is
with a universe such as the physical universe, so it is
with physical bodies. The thetan who has already gone
through the cycle on the universe itself may be in contact
with a physical body in the same order. At first he would
be without association with a physical body then with
occasional contact with bodies then with a fixed contact on
one body, but exteriorized then interiorized into a body,
but easy to exteriorize then in contact with and
interiorized into a body, but withdrawn from the various
parts of the body and then obsessively buttered all
through the body' then obsessively and unknowingly drawn
down to some small portion of the body, and so forth. This
is the gradient scale which includes inversion and then
inversion of the inversion. The auditor will discover
preclears are very variable in the matter of exteriorization.

Some preclears, even when they have a dark field,
exteriorize rather easily. Others, after a great deal of
work, are still found to be difficult to exteriorize. The
matter of exteriorization is the matter of which level of
inversion the preclear is in. One of the more difficult
levels to work is so inverted that he thinks that a thetan
is running him. In other words, here is a thetan
functioning in a body and actually running it through
various covert communication lines, who yet believes he is
a body to such an extent that he considers himself, or any
life around him to be some other being. When discussing the
matter of a thetan, this preclear is likely to tell the
auditor, I'm over there'. This is about the only signal
the auditor gets from such a case which tells him that the
preclear is being a body, and considers that he is being
run by another thetan.

Very often an auditor will "exteriorize" such a person, he
thinks, only to have the preclear say, "I'm over there". A 
thetan who knows he is a thetan is always "here" and never 
"there".

The diagnostic manifestation, however, which the auditor
first encounters in any case where he is having difficulty
with exteriorization is contained in Beingness. Those on
lower levels of inversion are having a great deal of
difficulty being anything. Such people are below the level
of being a body, therefore it would be far up-scale for
this person to be able to be a body with certainty. A
person who cannot exteriorize easily must be brought up to
the level where he can be a body before he can then be
exteriorized from the body. In other words, an auditor
exteriorizing anyone has to follow such a scale as
Beingness Processing.

Oddly enough, Beingness Processing is an excellent
exteriorization tool, and I say

Oddly enough' because, in one sense, Beingness Processing
is an Alter-is-ness process.

When a case is extremely inverted it is necessary to get
the case up to a level where it can identify itself with
something. Beingness is essentially an identification of
self with an object.

The commands used in Beingness Processing should begin with
the environment and the vicinity of the preclear. One has
the preclear look around the auditing room and select an
object, let us say a chair. The auditor does this by saying
Look around the room and discover some object which you
don't mind being present'. Remember always, that when an
auditor asks a question, that question has to be answered
by the preclear. It is the auditor's bad luck if he asks a
question which introduces an enormously long communication
lag in the preclear.

The preclear must still answer the question. At this
question, then, Discover something you don't mind being
present', it is necessary that the preclear actually locate
something, even if a dust mote. The auditor then asks the
preclear to Locate something else you don't mind being
present'. And when all communication lag is gone from this
level of process, the auditor then picks out an object
which the preclear was comfortable about and says: Now see
this (chair) here', All right, what else wouldn't you mind
this (chair) being?' And then, as the preclear answers
this, and using this same object, the auditor continues to
ask the same question until all communication lag is gone
from the question: What else wouldn't you mind this
(chair) being?'

The auditor then selects other objects in the area and uses
the same question on them:

What wouldn't you mind this (couch) being?', What else
wouldn't you mind this (couch) being?' When the preclear 
is perfectly willing to have anything in the room be 
a large number of things, including the walls, the 
ceiling, and the floor the auditor asks: 'Now what 
wouldn't you mind your body being?' And whatever
the preclear answers, 'And now what else wouldn't you mind
your body being?' Finally, when the preclear is able to do
all the foregoing in Beingness Processing, the auditor
commands him: 'Now let's find something you wouldn't mind
being', and, as this is the question for which the auditor
has been working, he uses this question for a very long
period of time, asking over and over, 'What else wouldn't
you mind being?'

It will be discovered in working Beingness Processing that
the entire mechanism of winning Valences occurs. Here, for
instance, is a thetan who is caught in a theta trap. After
a while he will consider that the trap itself is surviving,
which is to say that the motions of the trap have
themselves set the thetan into motion so that he now thinks
of himself totally as a trap. (This is how anybody gets to
be anything -- by getting set into motion by the vibrations
in his vicinity.)

At first the thetan is willing to be the trap, but after a
while, if asked to be the trap and then asked to be the
thetan (and this is not a process), the most terrible
apathy will be found to intervene between the two steps.
The thetan, while fairly comfortable being the trap, on
beginning to recover some of his own identity, will be
found to be at a point on the tone scale so low as to
contain an unbearable and agonizing apathy.

Beingness Processing recovers the various valences which
the thetan is trying to avoid.

As a practical example in life, we find a housewife who is
incapable of keeping house.

Although intelligent and able in most things, we find she
cannot sweep, make beds, or even shop for the house. We
discover that her mother was an excellent housekeeper, an
excellent cook, and could shop very well. If this is the
case, then we would also discover that the one person in
this world our preclear does not want to be is her mother.
In other words, by being unable to be her mother, she is
also unable to be all those things which her mother could
do or be. In other words, the matter of valences is also a
matter of packages of abilities, and where an individual is
unable to be something which has certain definite
abilities, he also cannot achieve those abilities, and
this, in itself, is the heart of disability.

In running Beingness Processing it will be discovered that
the imagination of the preclear revives to a marked extent.
This is a process which requires a skilled auditor, a
patient auditor, and one who is willing to level every
communication lag he encounters by repeating the same
question over and over, each time waiting to receive a
definite answer. It is not a process which one starts and
leaves uncompleted.


******** 


86. PAB   8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing

P.A.B. No. 56

PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR'S BULLETIN

From L. RON HUBBARD

Via Hubbard Communications Office

163 Holland Park Avenue, London W.11

_____________________________________

8 July 1955

AXIOM 51 AND COMMUNICATION PROCESSING

Let me give you a small review on communication. Axiom 51
says that MEST cannot change MEST, and we find that
postulates and live communication do change MEST. MEST
cannot change MEST, therefore a pair of forceps cannot
basically change a tooth condition.

This is sweeping and I want you to realize how sweeping it
actually is. A medical doctor would not be able to alter
completely a broken leg. You may say, "That's silly, of
course he could. He could come in and snap the bone back
into place and the fellow would feel a lot better." No, I'm
sorry, a medical doctor cannot over a period of time change
a broken leg. Do you know what will happen? Let's look at
it from the standpoint of life, now, and we find out that
the individual got attention for his broken leg, didn't he?
It will emerge as rheumatism some day.

In the next life it will emerge as two broken legs! We're
going to get a repetition of this because as soon as you
attempt to change MEST with MEST in one fashion or another
you are going to get persistence, and that is all.
Persistence of what?

In view of the fact that all conditions are postulated
conditions, and that the consideration behind them that
they are bad or good is simply again a consideration, if we
say persist it doesn't mean that it is either bad or good,
it simply means that condition. What condition is it? The
condition we are trying to change. And whenever we try to
change MEST with MEST we get a persistence of that
condition. It will crop up one way or another, and you will
see this time after time.

Dealing as we are in a very high echelon of live
communication, when we try to alter a condition with MEST
we get this persistence. Restimulation is the condition
persisting in the auditor, as an auditor who goes around
altering energy masses gets restimulated. The auditor comes
along and says, "Now all I have to do is change this energy
mass one way or the other," and he may succeed in doing so
as far as he can see for the moment. So he goes off
restimulated. That is the condition persisting. It's going
to persist, one way or the other. The only motto back of
MEST is "PERSIST."

But we have this licked. Hence Axiom 51. Postulates and
live communication actually can bring about a permanent
change and can actually stop a persistence.

Now, this process, "What wouldn't you mind ____ communicating 
with?"

"What wouldn't mind you communicating with?" is actually
not a low echelon process. A low-echelon preclear, one with
no mock-ups and very little reality, one who is not well
off, will not be touched by this process. He cannot
assimilate the process. Why? Because, to run this process,
you have to have the cooperation of the preclear's ability
to as-is. You have to have the ability of the preclear to
have a cognition and the ability of the preclear to as-is a
piece of energy, that is, to make a perfect duplicate of it.

Where, then, does that leave this process to be totally
functional? It leaves it upstairs, because when you run it
downstairs, the individual begins to "chew energy." Just
"chewing the energy around" doesn't make it persist, but,
with all this chewing, he isn't as-ising anything.

All he is doing is moving mass "A" to position "B." Anybody
who is doing this gets no cognition out of it at all. He is
waiting for that piece of energy to tell him something, and
this tells you a great deal about the preclear who couldn't
run an engram. He was waiting for the MEST to say something.

The preclear who could run engrams could still play a game
well enough to make the MEST say over and over again what
the MEST had imprinted on it. That is exactly why an engram
could run and why we had success in running engrams, and
when an engram disappeared that is exactly what happened.
It was up there all right, it was up there in lights, but
it wasn't saying anything. It was a bunch of sound waves
imprinted on a bunch of molecules of one kind or another,
and the preclear had to sort of pretend it was saying these
things over and over. In other words, he made it talk. Now
today an individual gets an engram in front of his face and
you just tell him to make it talk. Make it say, if you
please, exactly what is in the engram, or make it say
anythingit doesn't matter which.

As we look over this running of an engram, let us say that
we are getting an individual to run birth. What we are
doing is to get an energy mass called birth to articulate
to an individual, and it would run very handsomely indeed
if we had the preclear saying Okay. This is actually a
terrifically effective way to run an engram. If we wanted
to start today running engrams, we could, full out, and
achieve tremendously superior successes because we could
certainly run any kind of an engram in the bank. We could
dream it up, and the preclear could dream it up, could do
anything he wanted to, just to make these energy masses talk.

Of course very strange phenomena happen on an occluded case
when you have him dream up the fact that he has the concept
of an engram in front of him. You just look at him and you
say, "Now let's make believe that you have birth in
restimulation in front of you." (This would be a roughie,
and a weird way to go about it.) "And now let's pick up the
engram at the point where the doctor is saying, 'If you
will just take this pint of strychnine, mamma, the child
will be born much earlier.' " You have him to make this
concept say this, and have him say Okay to that.

The strange part of it is that you don't have to pay any
attention to whether birth shows up or not. I counted the
number of births on an individual one time and it was
several thousand, believe me, and they all go back to Fac
Ones and things like that. So we just have him get the idea
that he has birth in front of him and have it articulate.
Quite often this totally occluded case will have a complete
birth show up and begin to run off. But, he was totally
occluded, wasn't he? He couldn't run an engram.

We could just buckle right down at that point and actually
run that engram with Okays from the preclear, just as it
showed up, or we could go on running a synthetic engram. In
either case facsimiles would go out of restimulation in the
individual. As long as we have communication those energy
masses will disintegrate and you will stop the persistence
of the condition.

So let's look at the optimum way that I know of at this
momentthe best way I know ofto separate universes, on
which I have had considerable success and to date have had
no failures as long as the preclear could at least
articulate anything. As long as you can make him do
anything at all you can make him do this. You have seen the
process already.

"Give me some things you could say to your mother." If you
wanted to make this very perfect, if he is unable to play a
game you don't have to (very often the preclear is unable
to play a game), you would say, "Now get the idea mamma is
out there saying Okay to all of this." "Now give me
something else you could say to your mother." Then you say, 
"Get the idea mamma is out there and have her say 'Okay.' " 
"Now give me some things that mamma could say to you."

Now you will get a positive blow-apart in a fairly rapid
order of the interiorization of the universe. We know very
well that people interiorize into a body, into other
bodies, into MEST objects, into planets. So, if you were to 
run this one all the way backward you would take somebody 
who is obviously seen to be interiorized into earth, and 
what would you have him do?

You would say, "All right now, give me something earth
could say to you." If he is really interiorized into earth
he'll think up something. Then you have him say Okay.

The next thing you know he will get the ball of earth 'way
out there somewhere. Maybe it's the first picture he has
ever had! You will say, "That's fine. Now give me some more
things that earth could say to you." "Now give me some
things you could say to earth," and very ordinarily he will
come right on up the tone scale. You will never see such
perfect behavior of a tone scale as when you use a MEST object.

Then we would pick out (if we really were bent on exteriorizing 
Mr. Doakes and Mr. Doakes was interiorized into the interiorizations) 
another universe when we knew that we had the first one blown, and
we would know that because his physiological condition
would very definitely alter. We would go on to the next
likely universe.

We find this fellow who has been a linotype operator for
eight thousand seven hundred and sixty-two months, or
something of the sort. We don't have to be specific. We
pick a linotype machine, and we say if he got into earth he
certainly got there via some sort of apparatus he was
controlling, so we say, "All right, what could a linotype
machine say to you?" He would think it over for a moment. A
very literal-minded fellow would probably say, "It could
say 'clank.' "

"Okay, have it say clank."

"You know, I don't get any sonic on this," he'd say. (I've
had this happen.) "Well, just get the idea of its saying
clank."

"Well, it's going clank, all right."

("Oh no you don't," says the auditor, aside and to
himself.) "Have it SAY clank." "Have it SAY clank? A
linotype machine can't . . . well, I guess it could. On
thinking it over I guess a linotype machine could.... All
right, I'll have it say clank." "All right. Now have it say
something else." He does, and we blow him out of the
universe of the linotype machine.

Now let's pick the wife he hates worst, or something like
that. What could she say? etc.

Admittedly this is not a short process, but it keeps going
faster and faster. Next we would pull him out of papa and
mamma, and maybe grandma and grandpa, and so on. We are
doing one of these schoolbook, by the table, separations.
Then we say, "Now give me something your body could say to
you."

"My body say something to me?"

And away we would go, and we would blow him out of his head.

It will work with almost that mechanical ease. The question
is, how many hours of auditing would it take to bring
somebody who is totally interiorized into a planet out
through these various stages and finally out of his head?
As far as I'm concerned it is the minimum number of hours
he could be audited for maximum result.

We could do a tremendous number of things for him. We could
do a momentary patch-up on a lot of things, we could do
this and we could do that, but if we were going straight
toward the goal of making this individual into the highest
level of condition that we could make him
into, we would follow a process just about like this. It
would be slow, and it would be arduous, but we would get
better, and better, and better. He would finally get to a
point where he could feel these things blow off and blow
out on him.

I went so far one time as to try to exteriorize a fellow
from his engram bank. I think I exteriorized a lot of
thetans from that bank, but I never got the fellow out of
it entirely because I didn't have the time. His track
finally stretched out in all directions and he could view
it clearly, and then he was terribly interested and wanted
to run and have to do with each individual engram and there
were about seventy-six trillion years worth of them. Then
there was the whole GE line. So I abandoned that attempt.
He felt wonderful, though, and went around telling
everybody he was cleared. Compared to his earlier state he
sure was. He was cleared easily from eight or nine heavy
engrams in about eight or nine hours' auditing.

The articulation of the actual communication would be
something you would do on an individual who is having the
vaguest difficulty playing a game, who couldn't as-is birth
at a glance. And this is the conclusion I have reached
rather arduously over these past weeks on this. I give you
data when I have it.

Axiom 51 is right. It says you can't change MEST with MEST,
but postulates and live communication can change it. But
realization on the part of a preclear with no cognition is
not possible. So if he can't realize, that means he can't
as-is, so if he can't as-is, there he is. But I have seen
preclears pass right on up the line from cognition zero to
almost instantaneous cognition. In the Air Force they have
ceiling zero. We have cognition zero, but it's the same
thingtotal fog.

It is immensely safe for an auditor to change by
communication. There is no restimulation involved.

(the following is handwritten)

Text: R-39 Conceiving Something Interesting.  Interest
is the keynote of attachment.


******** 



